Skip to content

On Sept. 30, 2026, Senate negotiators announced agreement on the text of the “Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026,” a long-awaited bill to reform and expedite federal environmental and energy permitting. The 417-page bill is the product of intensive negotiations among the chairs and ranking members of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee and the Environment and Public Works Committee that began early in the 119th Congress.

The bill would make the most substantial amendments to NEPA since its enactment in 1969, and would reform permitting and review requirements under the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and numerous energy and mining statutes. The bill narrows federal jurisdiction, strengthens state authority, imposes agency review deadlines, vests original jurisdiction over NEPA and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) decisions in the federal courts of appeals, creates 150-day limits on judicial review of agency NEPA, NHPA and permitting decisions, and adopts limits on standing and remedies for litigants, all in an effort to shorten permitting timelines and reduce delays resulting from court challenges and injunctions.

If enacted, the permitting reform would represent a landmark update to the major environmental, energy, and mining laws governing development in the United States. However, the path to enactment remains uncertain. In a press conference on Sept. 30, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse noted that the bill sponsors plan a manager’s amendment, and expect further input and amendments from fellow senators, who are seeing the text of the bill just now. He also noted that the Trump administration’s renewable energy policies had complicated the negotiations, that this issue is not resolved, and that discussions with the administration are ongoing. The outcome of these discussions (among other factors) may determine whether the bill has enough Democratic support to reach the 60-vote threshold necessary to eliminate the threat of a filibuster so the Senate can proceed to consideration of the legislation.

The bill also would have to be reconciled with House permitting reform efforts, but sponsors noted at their Sept. 30 press conference that the bill already contains provisions from the House bills, and that House Committee chairs have been consulted as the Senate negotiations progressed. The House and Senate are now in recess until after the election, but the Senate will conduct a procedural vote on the permitting bill immediately when it returns on Nov. 9.

Continue reading the full GT Alert.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Steven Barringer Steven Barringer

Steven Barringer is a member of GT’s Environmental and Government Law and Policy practice groups. Steve has a unique practice that combines substantive environmental law knowledge with deep government law and policy experience. He began his career as an attorney-adviser and Special Assistant

…

Steven Barringer is a member of GT’s Environmental and Government Law and Policy practice groups. Steve has a unique practice that combines substantive environmental law knowledge with deep government law and policy experience. He began his career as an attorney-adviser and Special Assistant to the Solicitor at the Department of Interior. In private practice, Steve has represented industry clients in numerous EPA rulemakings, and defended clients in enforcement actions brought by EPA and states. He has advised companies regarding compliance with federal and state environmental laws. Steve has represented parties involved at major Superfund sites – including several of the largest Superfund sites in the United States – both in remediation settlement negotiations and cost-recovery actions. He has advised clients on international treaty obligations applicable to the transboundary movement of mercury and other hazardous wastes, and has managed local counsel examining environmental laws in Central America and Europe applicable to the transboundary movement of such wastes.

Steve’s broad experience representing environmental clients led to his work on government law and policy matters. He has interacted with federal and state regulators on numerous rule-makings and policy developments. He advises clients regarding federal legislative and agency strategy, including use of the appropriations process to achieve policy goals. Steve served on an EPA advisory committee examining federal hazardous waste regulations, and was selected by the House Energy and Commerce Committee to represent industry stakeholders in negotiations to develop consensus amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. He led an industry group advocating for reform of the federal mining laws. Representing industry clients, Steve has worked together with nongovernmental organizations to secure federal legislation banning the export of mercury from the United States.

Steve has been recognized by Who’s Who Legal as one of the top environmental practitioners representing the mining industry. One client described him as “absolutely the best.” He speaks and publishes on environmental legal and policy topics.

Photo of Stacey Bosshardt Stacey Bosshardt

With more than two decades of experience, Stacey Bosshardt is a “go to” litigator and strategist for complex environmental, natural resources, and public lands matters. Stacey represents mining, transmission, renewable energy, real estate, and governmental clients in high-stakes litigation and regulatory challenges throughout

…

With more than two decades of experience, Stacey Bosshardt is a “go to” litigator and strategist for complex environmental, natural resources, and public lands matters. Stacey represents mining, transmission, renewable energy, real estate, and governmental clients in high-stakes litigation and regulatory challenges throughout the country. She is recognized for her courtroom advocacy and her ability to help clients in litigation brought in an emergency posture; she has represented clients in dozens of motions for preliminary injunctive relief, summary judgment motions, and related appellate proceedings. Stacey also advises clients during the permitting process, drawing on her experience defending project decisions in court to create the most favorable record possible in the event a lawsuit is filed.

Stacey’s practice focuses on cases involving major federal environmental statutes, including the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Endangered Species Act, National Historic Preservation Act, Clean Water Act, Federal Land Policy Management Act, Mineral Leasing Act, and Administrative Procedure Act. She is a frequent speaker and author on environmental and administrative law topics. Stacey regularly serves as lead counsel in litigation challenging permits, approvals, and plans for transmission lines, renewable energy facilities, pipelines, mining operations, real estate developments and major infrastructure projects. She also represents state transportation agencies.

Her government service includes roles as Assistant Section Chief and Senior Trial Attorney in the U.S. Department of Justice’s Environment and Natural Resources Division, where she supervised teams of trial lawyers and led dozens of cases defending federal agency decisions—often for agencies such as the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Forest Service, and Department of Transportation. Stacey also served as Ethics Advisor to the White House Counsel’s Office and as counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs’ special investigation into the government’s response to Hurricane Katrina, with a focus on climate-driven events and disaster preparedness.

Stacey’s litigation portfolio spans the country and includes defending federal approvals for roads or other rights-of-way across federal lands, energy and transportation projects, oil and gas development, mining, and real estate development. She has represented manufacturing clients in Endangered Species Act litigation and utility companies in landmark renewable energy delivery cases. Stacey is adept at briefing and arguing dispositive motions in federal district courts and appeals in circuit courts, including critical statutory and constitutional claims. Her deep command of environmental law and understanding of complex, multi-jurisdictional matters make her a trusted advisor for both public and private sector clients.

Photo of Kenneth M. Minesinger Kenneth M. Minesinger

Ken focuses on complex energy matters, typically in the oil and gas industry, including major energy regulatory and project development matters. Ken represents clients in the development of their oil and gas resources, on major pipeline and LNG projects, and on a wide…

Ken focuses on complex energy matters, typically in the oil and gas industry, including major energy regulatory and project development matters. Ken represents clients in the development of their oil and gas resources, on major pipeline and LNG projects, and on a wide range of energy regulatory issues. Ken is experienced in commercial and fiscal negotiations relating to major project agreements, and in regulatory proceedings including ratemaking, permitting, market power/competition issues and valuation disputes.

Jennifer H. Weddle

Jennifer Weddle is the Co-Chair of the firm’s American Indian Law Practice and has wide-ranging experience in complex regulatory and jurisdictional issues, with a focus in Indian law, handling a variety of matters for tribal and non-tribal clients. She has a dynamic, inter-disciplinary

…

Jennifer Weddle is the Co-Chair of the firm’s American Indian Law Practice and has wide-ranging experience in complex regulatory and jurisdictional issues, with a focus in Indian law, handling a variety of matters for tribal and non-tribal clients. She has a dynamic, inter-disciplinary practice that centers on providing strategies for resolving complex jurisdictional problems. Much of her practice focuses in the areas of tribal economic development and natural resources development. Jennifer also has U.S. Supreme Court experience, including serving as one of the attorneys for the respondent in Nevada v. Hicks (2001) and representing the petitioners in Ute Mountain Ute Tribe v. Padilla (2012) and Grand Canyon Skywalk Development, LLC v. Grand Canyon Resort Corporation (2013) and cert stage amici in Saginaw-Chippewa Tribe v. NLRB (2016) and United States v. Cooley (2020) and amici on the merits in Lewis v. Clarke (2017), U.S. v. Washington (2018), Carpenter v. Murphy (2018), McGirt v. Oklahoma (2020), United States v. Cooley (2020), Denezpi v. United States (2021), Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (2022), Navajo Nation v. United States (2023), and Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe and Northern Arapaho Tribe (2024).

Jennifer’s work also includes negotiations for mineral leasing, employment matters, and representation before federal agencies. She has also been involved in civil litigation, working on numerous complex federal, state and tribal litigation matters, including class action tort litigation and large commercial disputes. Jennifer also has securities litigation experience and products liability litigation experience, and her transactional experience includes oil and gas and renewables projects throughout the west, as well as Endangered Species Act work.

Jennifer has broad trial and appellate litigation experience (more than 40 trials), and frequently litigates jurisdictional issues. She is also experienced in sovereign models for consumer lending and energy development. Jennifer frequently assists tribes, banks and non-bank entities with financing and regulatory matters with Indian law components.

Jennifer has wide-ranging project siting experience, including the application of NEPA, NHPA, and other environmental laws on tribal and public lands, including with respect to large linear multi-state energy and infrastructure projects.

Jennifer has deep transactional, regulatory and litigation experience involving very complex matters with both legal and policy components.

Photo of Michael Kaufmann Michael Kaufmann

Michael E. Kaufmann focuses his practice on energy regulatory and compliance matters. His practice encompasses federal and state administrative and regulatory law, litigation, enforcement, appeals, policy, and infrastructure and project development in the energy sector. He is a constant advocate for gas and

…

Michael E. Kaufmann focuses his practice on energy regulatory and compliance matters. His practice encompasses federal and state administrative and regulatory law, litigation, enforcement, appeals, policy, and infrastructure and project development in the energy sector. He is a constant advocate for gas and electric utility and merchant clients, as well as industrial end-users.

Michael represents a diverse range of clients in the energy industry, including independent power producers, power marketers, cooperatives, municipal utilities, and industrial energy consumers. He handles regulatory and enforcement proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and regulatory proceedings before various state commissions. His work includes negotiating wholesale and retail power supply agreements and counseling developers of new energy facilities across the United States.

In the area of project infrastructure and finance, Michael provides regulatory advice to project sponsors and financial institutions involved in the financing and development of critical energy infrastructure. This includes merchant and utility power plants, natural gas pipelines, transmission projects, renewable power projects, hydroelectric facilities, and liquefied natural gas projects.

Michael’s experience extends beyond private practice. He has served as in-house counsel for energy companies, including as Director of Regulatory Affairs at NRG Energy and as Senior Counsel at Constellation Energy Resources. In these roles, he managed regulatory affairs at FERC, advised on wholesale gas regulatory issues, and counseled business units on legal, regulatory, and compliance matters at federal and state levels.

Additionally, Michael has wide-ranging government experience. He worked at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as an Attorney-Advisor in the Office of General Counsel, Energy Markets Section, and as a federal appellate attorney in the Office of the Solicitor. In these positions, he advised on issues related to competitive wholesale electric energy markets, transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce, and electric system reliability.