Tag Archives: CERCLA

Jillian Kirn to Participate in Webinar on Resolving Superfund Liability and Protecting PRP Interests

By Greenberg Traurig, LLP on Posted in CERCLA, Court Cases, Events, Featured, Superfund
Environmental Practice Shareholder Jillian C. Kirn of global law firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP will participate in a live 90-minute Strafford CLE video webinar with interactive Q&A on Tuesday, Jan. 12 from 1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. ET, titled “Resolving Superfund Liability and Protecting PRP Interests: Recent Developments and Best Practices in Settling and Preserving CERCLA Claims.” Continue reading … Continue Reading

The Superfund Contribution Mind Pretzel…or One of Them

By David Mandelbaum on Posted in Articles, Pennsylvania, Superfund
From the first days of Superfund litigation, lawyers and courts have complained that Congress did not distinguish itself when drafting the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. Sections 9601-75. As the law has developed, court decisions have created additional problems. The interplay among the private cost recovery provision of Section 107(a)(1-4)(B) … Continue Reading

Congress Takes Initial Steps to Address PFAS in the National Defense Authorization Act Conference Report

By Steven Barringer, Keith E. Smith and Katie P. Reed˘ on Posted in CERCLA, Chemicals, Compliance, Contamination, Emerging Contaminants, Environment, EPA, Federal Regulation, GT Alert, PFAS, PFOA, PFOS, Safe Drinking Water Act, Superfund, TSCA
On Dec. 11, the House of Representatives passed S. 1790, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) conference report. The Senate followed suit on Dec. 17, bringing an end to protracted negotiations on this annual must-pass legislation. In one of their final acts, conferees agreed to provisions addressing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Two major provisions … Continue Reading

FDA Findings on PFAS Chemicals in U.S. Food and Drinking Water Supply

By Steven Barringer, Bernadette M. Rappold and Kaitlyn R Maxwell on Posted in CERCLA, Clean Water Act, Emerging Contaminants, Environment, EPA, Federal Drug Administration (FDA), New Jersey, PFAS, PFOA, PFOS
This week the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) confirmed it had conducted a study finding that certain types of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have entered American food and drinking water supplies; however, “[c]urrent FDA testing has found that most foods have no or very low levels of PFAS.” The FDA’s efforts are ongoing … Continue Reading

Pennsylvania Prospective Purchasers of Contaminated Property and Their Administrative Records

By David Mandelbaum on Posted in CERCLA, Environment, Pennsylvania, Prospective Purchaser Agreement, State & Local, Superfund
On April 26, 2019, the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board (EHB) voided two amendments to a prospective purchaser agreement (PPA) for the Bishop Tube Site entered into in 2007 and 2010. Del. Riverkeeper Network v. Dep’t of Envt’l Prot’n, EHB Dkt. No. 2018-020-L (Constitution Drive Partners). The underlying PPA was dated 2005. The Department of Environmental … Continue Reading

Can a State Provide Oversight Under a Federal CERCLA Order or Decree?

By David Mandelbaum on Posted in CERCLA, Environment, EPA, Federal Regulation, Superfund
Section 400(h) of the National Contingency Plan (NCP) contains an unremarked, yet problematic, last sentence. The NCP, of course, governs response actions under the federal Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund); the government cannot recover costs incurred inconsistently with that regulation. 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(1-4)(A). Section 400(h) provides: (h) Oversight. The … Continue Reading

What You Need to Know About the Superfund Task Force’s Recommendations

By Caleb Holmes on Posted in CERCLA, EPA, Superfund
There are over 1,300 sites listed on the Environmental Protection Agency’s National Priorities List of contaminated sites that require cleanup, over a hundred of which are located in Pennsylvania. In May, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt promised to get “hands-on” with the Superfund program in order to expedite the cleanup of contaminated sites around the country, … Continue Reading

EPA Seeks to Impose Financial Responsibility Requirements on Hardrock Mine Operators

By Sonali Dohale on Posted in Chemicals, Environment, EPA, Federal Regulation
On Dec. 1, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) administrator signed a proposed rule, “Financial Responsibility Requirements under CERCLA § 108(b) for Classes of Facilities in the Hardrock Mining Industry,” which would impose new financial responsibility requirements for current owners and operators of hardrock mines, including numerous metal mines in the western United States. Federal Register … Continue Reading

Massachusetts High Court Rules Leaded Gasoline is Not “Oil” Subject to Less Stringent Cleanup Requirements

By Hamilton Hackney III on Posted in Energy, Environment, Litigation, Massachusetts, Oil & Gas
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) upheld a statutory interpretation by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) that the statutory definition of “oil” does not include leaded gasoline. As a result, contamination from leaded gasoline released from a gas station was not eligible for less stringent remediation standards applicable to “oil” releases.  Based on … Continue Reading

GT Philadelphia at the PA Environmental Law Forum

By Kathleen M. Kline on Posted in Events, Pennsylvania
Recently, lawyers from Philadelphia’s Environmental Practice Group attended the Pennsylvania Environmental Law Forum in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Organized by the Pennsylvania Bar Institute, the annual Forum includes educational presentations by experienced practitioners along with networking events. Jillian Kirn gave a presentation on cooling water intake structures commonly used by industrial facilities, such as power plants, and the … Continue Reading

CERCLA Statutes of Limitations Confusion in Administrative Settlements

By Caleb Holmes on Posted in CERCLA
When a private party enters into a CERCLA section 113(f)(B) administrative settlement, it may subsequently pursue the costs incurred under that administrative settlement against other PRPs. However, whether the settling party may bring a section 107 cost recovery claim or a section 113 contribution claim depends on the language of the settlement. A court’s interpretation … Continue Reading

Supreme Court Won’t Consider What Level of Deference States Should Be Given Under CERCLA

By Caleb Holmes on Posted in CERCLA, Court Cases, Federal Regulation
As noted previously, the Ninth Circuit found, in Arizona v. City of Tucson, 761 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 2014), that state government agencies are not afforded the same level of deference as EPA on the question of whether a CERCLA consent decree is fair, reasonable and consistent with CERCLA.  Arizona filed a petition for writ … Continue Reading

Government Access to Contaminated Sites

By David Mandelbaum on Posted in Articles, Court Cases, Pennsylvania
Regulators need access to environmentally contaminated sites.  They have to study them to determine whether the contamination requires a cleanup, they have to choose a cleanup, they have to conduct or direct implementation of that cleanup, and then they have to provide for its monitoring and maintenance.  But when the contaminated property is not the … Continue Reading

CERCLA Preemption of State Law Contribution Claims under Pennsylvania HSCA

By David Mandelbaum on Posted in Articles, Environment, Litigation, Pennsylvania
The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) allows private parties that incur cleanup costs to reallocate those costs to others through a cost recovery claim under section 107(a)(1-4)(B) or a contribution claim under section 113(f)(1) or (3)(B).  So do some state statutes and state common law.  There can only be one allocation … Continue Reading

Thinking About Natural Resource Damages

By David Mandelbaum on Posted in Articles, Environment, Pennsylvania
My column this month in the Pennsylvania Law Weekly considers natural resource damages and their measurement.  NRDs are available under a number of federal programs.  To my knowledge, however, Pennsylvania state trustees have only sought to recover NRDs twice. We have to think about whether that might change.  The Supreme Court’s plurality opinion in Robinson … Continue Reading

Second Circuit Examines Collateral Source Rule in CERCLA Cost Recovery and Contribution Case

By Caleb Holmes on Posted in Court Cases
On September 11, 2014, the Second Circuit issued its decision in New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. FirstEnergy Corp., No. 11-4143, a CERCLA cost recovery and contribution case arising from the cleanup of coal tar contamination at sixteen manufactured gas plants in New York.  New York State Electric & Gas Corp (“NYSEG”) filed a … Continue Reading

Charities, Donated Land and Environmental Liability

By David Mandelbaum on Posted in Environment
This month’s column in the Pennsylvania Law Weekly addresses the contamination risk faced by charities that accept donated land.  I particularly treat the problem of charities whose very purpose calls for them to accept environmentally suspect property.  Perhaps it has been a vacant lot subject to fly dumping.  Perhaps the charity is specifically intended to locate in … Continue Reading

Institutional Controls and Pre-enforcment Review in Cleanup Cases

By David Mandelbaum on Posted in Court Cases, Environment
  My October Environmental Practice Column in the Pennsylvania Law Weekly considers issues presented by the intersection of the bar on pre-enforcement review and reliance on “institutional controls.”  These issues come up in federal Superfund matters under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-75.  However, the discussion was motivated by a  September 4 ruling by … Continue Reading

CERCLA Updates

By Caleb Holmes on Posted in Court Cases
Hamilton Hackney discusses two recent CERCLA cases, which address, respectively (1) the constitutionality of unilateral adminstrative orders (UAOs), and (2) who has authority to recover penalties for alleged violations of UAOs. … Continue Reading
LexBlog