Skip to content

On April 29, 2021, Administrator Michael Regan announced that EPA plans to add Natural Gas Processing (NGP) facilities to the list of industries subject to Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting requirements. TRI requires facilities to report releases of toxic chemicals if the facilities’ manufacture, process, or other use of the chemicals exceed regulatory thresholds. TRI reports (Form Rs) must be filed annually on or before July 1 for the preceding calendar year. While the TRI program does not require facilities to acquire any new data, compliance requires a significant amount of analysis of existing facility records and data.

EPA first proposed the addition of NGP facilities on Jan. 6, 2017 (82 Fed. Reg. 1651), but the proposal languished during the Trump administration. The proposed rule describes NGPs as “stationary surface facilities that receive gas from a gathering system that supplies raw natural gas from many nearby wells.” 82 Fed. Reg. at 1653. The facilities separate natural gas liquids from raw natural gas and fractionate them or send them off-site for further processing. EPA has identified 517 such facilities (in the lower 48 states), and estimates that over half of them would meet TRI reporting thresholds. The final rule likely will impose TRI reporting requirements on all facilities in North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 211112 – Natural Gas Liquid Extraction. Some of these facilities are already subject to TRI requirements if they “primarily engage in sulfur recovery from natural gas.” 40 C.F.R. § 372.23(b).

If the rule is finalized in 2021, as expected, TRI requirements will begin to apply on Jan. 1, 2022 (Reporting Year 2022), and the first TRI reports will be due on July 1, 2023.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Steven Barringer Steven Barringer

Steven Barringer is a member of GT’s Environmental and Government Law and Policy practice groups. Steve has a unique practice that combines substantive environmental law knowledge with deep government law and policy experience. He began his career as an attorney-adviser and Special Assistant

Steven Barringer is a member of GT’s Environmental and Government Law and Policy practice groups. Steve has a unique practice that combines substantive environmental law knowledge with deep government law and policy experience. He began his career as an attorney-adviser and Special Assistant to the Solicitor at the Department of Interior. In private practice, Steve has represented industry clients in numerous EPA rulemakings, and defended clients in enforcement actions brought by EPA and states. He has advised companies regarding compliance with federal and state environmental laws. Steve has represented parties involved at major Superfund sites – including several of the largest Superfund sites in the United States – both in remediation settlement negotiations and cost-recovery actions. He has advised clients on international treaty obligations applicable to the transboundary movement of mercury and other hazardous wastes, and has managed local counsel examining environmental laws in Central America and Europe applicable to the transboundary movement of such wastes.

Steve’s broad experience representing environmental clients led to his work on government law and policy matters. He has interacted with federal and state regulators on numerous rule-makings and policy developments. He advises clients regarding federal legislative and agency strategy, including use of the appropriations process to achieve policy goals. Steve served on an EPA advisory committee examining federal hazardous waste regulations, and was selected by the House Energy and Commerce Committee to represent industry stakeholders in negotiations to develop consensus amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. He led an industry group advocating for reform of the federal mining laws. Representing industry clients, Steve has worked together with nongovernmental organizations to secure federal legislation banning the export of mercury from the United States.

Steve has been recognized by Who’s Who Legal as one of the top environmental practitioners representing the mining industry. One client described him as “absolutely the best.” He speaks and publishes on environmental legal and policy topics.