In a rulemaking closely watched by the transloading industry, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a final rule on March 1, 2024, updating the Accidental Release Prevention Requirements and Risk Management Program under Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act (RMP). 40 CFR Part 68. (“Transloading” refers to movement of goods and commodities across different modes of transportation: for example, rail to truck, or truck to ship.)

The new rule aims to reduce the frequency and severity of accidents by revising chemical process safety to require regulated facilities – covering 11,740 regulated RMP facilities across the country – to perform a safer technologies and alternatives analysis and will require third-party compliance audits and root cause analysis incident investigation for facilities that have had a prior accident.

Additionally, the rule requires increased engagement with employees through training opportunities and the implementation of community notification systems. In creating risk management plans, regulated facilities will have to consider the potential impacts of climate change, among other factors, and provide additional facility information to members of the surrounding community.

Transloading industry advocates were closely watching the rule to see how the EPA would handle a proposal that would have required full RMP plans for any facility where covered goods or commodities were disconnected from motive transportation for 48 hours or more.

Acknowledging comments suggesting the 48-hour presumption might increase, rather than decrease, safety concerns and conflict with Department of Transportation rules, the EPA rejects the presumption in the new rule and reverts to the status quo ante. The EPA’s existing guidance suggests storage of chemicals begins the moment the goods are disconnected from the motive power that brought them to a facility. This position has never been tested in court, however, and it remains to be seen how the judiciary might view a facility where, for example, a railcar’s contents are briefly held to facilitate transloading. Given potential conflicts with other federal rules, the new rule seems likely to generate renewed interest from the public and industry alike.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Bernadette M. Rappold Bernadette M. Rappold

Bernadette M. Rappold focuses her practice on federal and state regulatory issues related to energy, manufacturing, and the environment. Bernadette has substantial litigation experience and advises clients on regulatory compliance as well as the environmental, safety, and health aspects of numerous business and…

Bernadette M. Rappold focuses her practice on federal and state regulatory issues related to energy, manufacturing, and the environment. Bernadette has substantial litigation experience and advises clients on regulatory compliance as well as the environmental, safety, and health aspects of numerous business and real estate transactions, including water, air, and chemical hazards. Bernadette offers clients perspective gained through years of service at the Environmental Protection Agency. While serving as a director of the Special Litigation and Projects Division in the Office of Civil Enforcement at the EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, Bernadette led complex enforcement actions in response to violations of the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and other environmental statutes. Her work at the EPA covered a variety of economic and industrial sectors including the oil and gas, chemical, pharmaceutical, telecommunications, and agriculture industries.

Photo of Christopher J. Neumann Christopher J. Neumann

Chris Neumann is a Co-Chair of the firm’s Environmental Practice. He counsels clients in the natural gas, petroleum, mining, construction, retail, home building, solid and hazardous waste, and other industries on a wide variety of litigation, environmental, mining, and real estate matters. Chris…

Chris Neumann is a Co-Chair of the firm’s Environmental Practice. He counsels clients in the natural gas, petroleum, mining, construction, retail, home building, solid and hazardous waste, and other industries on a wide variety of litigation, environmental, mining, and real estate matters. Chris represents clients in connection with internal investigations and emergency response following spills, pipe failures and other environmental incidents. He also defends clients in connection with civil, criminal and administrative enforcement by USEPA, states, tribes, local governments and citizen groups. Chris has advised clients on litigation and enforcement matters, as well as related auditing and compliance matters, under the Clean Water Act (CWA), Clean Air Act (CAA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA), Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), Mine Safety and Health Act (MSHA), and numerous other federal, state and tribal laws.

Photo of Mary Katherine Andrews Mary Katherine Andrews

Mary Katherine Andrews is a member of the Environmental Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Denver Office. Her practice focuses on Environmental Litigation and Energy Law, drafting, issuing, and enforcing regulations related to environmental protection.

Mary Katherine advises clients on litigation and enforcement matters, as…

Mary Katherine Andrews is a member of the Environmental Practice in Greenberg Traurig’s Denver Office. Her practice focuses on Environmental Litigation and Energy Law, drafting, issuing, and enforcing regulations related to environmental protection.

Mary Katherine advises clients on litigation and enforcement matters, as well as related auditing and compliance matters, under the Clean Water Act (CWA), Clean Air Act (CAA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). Mary Katherine is also a member of GT’s Water Law practice, assisting with matters regarding water rights.

Photo of Casey A. Shpall Casey A. Shpall

Casey A. Shpall focuses her practice on environmental matters. Prior to joining Greenberg Traurig, she served in the Colorado Department of Law for over 20 years, most recently as the Deputy Attorney General in the Natural Resources and Environment Section.