My November environmental practice column for the Pennsylvania Law Weekly considered the problem of terminating an environmental obligation when conditions change after a time.  In the pursuit of “paradise by the dashboard light,” as Meatloaf taught, if I promise to love you until the end of time, I might end up “praying for the end of time so I can end my time with you.”  So too with all kinds of agreements to fund operation, maintenance, wastewater treatment, grubbing and mowing, and so forth.

Wyeth Pharmaceuticals v. Borough of West Chester, No. 2116 C.D. 2014 (Pa. Commw. Ct. Nov. 5, 2015), considered such an agreement by what was in 1984 a large industrial water user to fund a municipal sewage treatment plant.  By 2005, the industrial facility had been closed and demolished; consequently, it produced no further wastewater.  The Commonwealth Court cited a policy against perpetual agreements unless they are explicit, and allowed Wyeth to terminate its obligation.  The lesson, though, is to attend to the termination provisions going in, because forever is a long time from now.

Read Environmental Commitments and the Pursuit of Paradise by the Dashboard Light, 38 Pa. L. Weekly 1068 (Nov. 17, 2015), by clicking here.

The on-line version on the Legal Intelligencer/Pennsylvania Law Weekly website has a fabulous graphic.  It’s all the editors’ doing, but highly recommended.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of David Mandelbaum David Mandelbaum

David G. Mandelbaum represents clients facing problems under environmental laws. He regularly represents clients in lawsuits and also has helped clients achieve satisfactory outcomes through regulatory negotiation or private transactions. A Fellow of the American College of Environmental Lawyers, David teaches Superfund, and…

David G. Mandelbaum represents clients facing problems under environmental laws. He regularly represents clients in lawsuits and also has helped clients achieve satisfactory outcomes through regulatory negotiation or private transactions. A Fellow of the American College of Environmental Lawyers, David teaches Superfund, and Oil and Gas Law in rotation at the Temple University Beasley School of Law as well as an environmental litigation course at Suffolk (Boston) Law School.

Since United States v. Atlas Minerals, the first multi-generator Superfund contribution case to go to trial in 1993, Mr. Mandelbaum has been engaged in matters involving allocation of costs among responsible parties, especially under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA).  He has tried large cases and resolved others as lead counsel.  He has written, spoken, and taught extensively on the subject.  More recently he also has been engaged to assist lead counsel from this firm and others:

  • to develop cost allocation methodologies;
  • to craft expert testimony in support of a favored methodology (given a definition of “fairness,” why one methodology better tracks it than another);
  • to develop efficient case management approaches; and to assist private allocation as part of the neutral team.

Concentrations

  • Air, water and waste regulation
  • Superfund and contamination
  • Climate change
  • Oil and gas development
  • Water rights