Claiming to be “green” and “sustainable” has become a competitiveness perimeter in the EU, with green products registering greater growth than other products. However, not all products on the EU market are as environmentally friendly as presented by the companies and thus may be misleading to the consumers in relation to their environmental impact. Such practices, known as “greenwashing”, may hamper the reduction of negative environmental impact and ultimately thwart the green transition. An EU Commission study dating from 2020 found that approx. 53% of the claims examined were vague, misleading, or unfounded and 40% lacked sufficient supporting evidence.

To prevent greenwashing, the EU Commission proposed a new Green Claims Directive on March 22, 2023. Pursuant to the proposal, the Directive will address greenwashing risk by (i) tackling false environmental claims made towards consumers and (ii) stopping the proliferation of public and private environmental labels. The Directive’s key objective is to protect the customers and ensure that green claims across the EU are reliable, comparable and verifiable. The Directive is thus to facilitate creation of the green, circular economy, based on well-informed decisions of the customers.

Together with the March 30, 2022 proposal for an EU Directive on empowering consumers for the green transition, the new rules would establish a clear regime for environmental claims and labels. They aim to ensure that consumers receive trustworthy information about the environmental credentials of the products they buy. To achieve this aim, new rules will, in particular: (i) establish clear criteria on how to prove such claims, (ii) set a requirement for the claims and labels to be checked by the independent and accredited verifier, and (iii) set rules for the governance of environmental labeling systems to ensure they are solid, transparent and reliable.

The Green Claims Directive targets claims made explicitly and voluntarily by business to the customers, where such claims relate to environmental aspects of a product or the trader itself. The proposed directive only concerns claims that other EU rules do not currently cover. This means that if an EU instrument establishes more specific rules on environmental claims for a particular sector or product category, such as the energy efficiency label, those rules will prevail over those of the proposed Directive.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Marijn Bodelier Marijn Bodelier

Marijn Bodelier focuses on public law, environmental law, and real estate. He is regularly involved in international transactions and projects where public law aspects are a key-element. Marijn has particular experience in litigation and contracts with respect to real estate developments, permitting processes…

Marijn Bodelier focuses on public law, environmental law, and real estate. He is regularly involved in international transactions and projects where public law aspects are a key-element. Marijn has particular experience in litigation and contracts with respect to real estate developments, permitting processes, expropriation and renewable energy projects. Marijn is Co-Chair of GT’s global Hydrogen Group.

Photo of Robert Hardy Robert Hardy

Dr. Robert Hardy, LL.M. (Harvard) is a Local Partner in the firm’s Amsterdam office. He advises clients on matters spanning a wide spectrum of economic sectors, including consumer products, energy, financial services, manufacturing, life sciences, TMT, and transportation.

Robert focuses his practice on:…

Dr. Robert Hardy, LL.M. (Harvard) is a Local Partner in the firm’s Amsterdam office. He advises clients on matters spanning a wide spectrum of economic sectors, including consumer products, energy, financial services, manufacturing, life sciences, TMT, and transportation.

Robert focuses his practice on:

  • Antitrust Litigation & Competition Regulation
  • International Trade
  • Regulatory & Compliance.

Antitrust Litigation & Competition Regulation

Robert’s practice covers a wide range of issues under European and Dutch competition law. He represents clients before the European Commission (EC), the Dutch Competition Authority (ACM), the Dutch administrative law courts, and the EU courts in matters relating to cartel defense, abuse of dominance, merger control, and State aid proceedings. Additionally, he represents clients before the Dutch civil law courts on issues relating to antitrust damages claims.

International Trade

Robert provides clients with guidance on ex-U.S. foreign investment review – e.g., foreign direct investment (FDI) / national security regimes –, intellectual property – standard essential patents (SEPs) and FRAND licensing disputes before the Dutch civil law courts –, transactions, import and export controls, and sanctions.

Regulatory & Compliance

Robert advises clients on a diverse range of EU and Dutch regulatory frameworks that impact business matters. He provides proactive and responsive advice and legal risk assessments to clients, assisting with day-to-day business transactions, counseling on the applicability and effect of regulations, and providing guidance on how to mitigate the risks of potential enforcement actions – e.g., helping clients build effective yet practical internal compliance programs, and advising companies on commercial agency, distribution, and franchise arrangements.

Robert is a member of the Amsterdam Sustainability Desk. The Sustainability Desk is available daily and provides assistance and support for real estate sustainability inquiries in the Netherlands and the EU. Please visit our dedicated Sustainability Desk page for more information.